Kander: Time for Legislature to pass medical marijuana law

Missouri Secretary of State Jason Kander, who is the Democratic nominee for the U.S. Senate, said Thursday that it’s “time for the state legislature to step up” and pass a law allowing medical marijuana.

Kander came out in support of medical marijuana in a statement through the secretary of state’s office, not his Senate campaign. He was commenting on a judge’s ruling Wednesday that a proposal allowing medical marijuana in Missouri won’t go to voters because the number of petition signatures fell short.

“While supporters of this important proposal can try to put it on the ballot again in two years, I believe it is time for the state legislature to step up,” Kander said in the statement. “The Missouri General Assembly should pass legislation to allow medical marijuana so Missouri families that could greatly benefit from it don’t have to watch their loved ones continue suffering. If the legislature is not willing to do that, they should at least put the measure on the ballot themselves in 2018 to give Missouri voters the opportunity to decide on this issue.”

Stephanie Fleming, a spokeswoman for the secretary of state’s office, said Kander does not take a public position on ballot initiative petitions until the process is complete, which was why he waited until Thursday to make the statement.

(Excerpted from Columbia Daily Tribune 9/22/16)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Missouri senate no slam dunk as GOP spends to save Blunt

In an election with control of the Senate at stake, Republicans were counting on a win in GOP-friendly Missouri. Instead they’re suddenly plunging millions into the state to save incumbent Sen. Roy Blunt from a young challenger who assembled an AR-15 rifle blindfolded in a daring new ad.

Polls show the race is close, but Democrats argue the momentum is with Missouri’s 35-year-old secretary of state, Jason Kander, a former Army intelligence officer in Afghanistan.

Privately some Republicans voice dismay they have to intervene in the Missouri race to such an extent at a time when they’re defending incumbents in blue and purple states around the country.

Kander himself, in a phone interview with the Associated Press, said he is seeing increasing enthusiasm at his rallies. The gun ad, he said, certainly helped.
“Our message from day one has been that Missourians are frustrated with politics as usual in Washington and are ready for a new generation of leadership,” Kander said. “Clearly, that’s resonating.”

(Excerpted from News Tribune 9/22/16)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Missouri senate no slam dunk as GOP spends to save Blunt

Where did Donald Trump get his racialized rhetoric? The intersection of white nationalism, the alt-right and Ron Paul

Trump’s style and positions — endorsing and consorting with 9/11 truthers, promoting online racists, using fake statistics — draw on a now-obscure political strategy called “paleolibertarianism,” which was once quite popular among some Republicans, especially former presidential candidate Ron Paul.

But there’s no question that the paranoid and semi-racialist mien frequently favored by Trump originates in the fevered swamps that the elder Paul dwelled in for decades. Most people who back Trump don’t do so for racist reasons, but it’s incredible how many of the same white nationalists and conspiracy theorists to whom Ron Paul once catered are now ardent Trump supporters. It’s because Trump and Paul speak the same language.

Mainstream libertarians have been agonizing over this legacy among themselves for some time,hoping that either the elder or younger Paul would definitively denounce the movement’s racialist past, but no such speech has ever come. Instead, the paleolibertarian strategy concocted decades ago as a way to push for minimal government threatens to replace right-wing libertarianism with white nationalism.

The figure whose ideas unify Pauline libertarians and today’s Trumpists is the late Murray Rothbard, an economist who co-founded the Cato Institute and is widely regarded as the creator of libertarianism.

Nowadays, many libertarians like to portray their ideology as one that somehow transcends the left-right divide, but to Rothbard, this was nonsense. Libertarianism, he argued, was nothing more than a restatement of the beliefs of the “Old Right,” which resolutely opposed the New Deal and any sort of foreign intervention in the early 20th century.

There had always been some sympathy for racism and anti-Semitism among libertarians — the movement’s house magazine, Reason, dedicated an entire issue in 1976 to “historical revisionism,” including Holocaust revisionism. It also repeatedly ran articles in defense of South Africa’s then-segregationist government (though by 2016, the magazine was running articles like “Donald Trump Enables Racism”). But it was Rothbard’s founding of the Ludwig von Mises Institute in 1982 that enabled the fledgling political movement to establish affinity with the neo-Confederate Lost Cause movement.

(Excerpted from Sheffield Washington Post 9/02/16)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Where did Donald Trump get his racialized rhetoric? The intersection of white nationalism, the alt-right and Ron Paul

Union decline lowers wages of nonunion workers The overlooked reason why wages are stuck and inequality is growing

Pay for private-sector workers has barely budged over the past three and a half decades. In fact, for men in the private sector who lack a college degree and do not belong to a labor union, real wages today are substantially lower than they were in the late 1970s.

In the debates over the causes of wage stagnation, the decline in union power has not received nearly as much attention as globalization, technological change, and the slowdown in Americans’ educational attainment. Unions, especially in industries and regions where they are strong, help boost the wages of all workers by establishing pay and benefit standards that many nonunion firms adopt. But this union boost to nonunion pay has weakened as the share of private-sector workers in a union has fallen from 1 in 3 in the 1950s to about 1 in 20 today.

Nonunion workers benefit from a strong union presence in their labor market in many ways. Strong unions set pay and benefits standards that nonunion employers follow. Those employers may raise pay for some workers to forestall an organizing drive, which leads to an upward adjustment in wages of workers above them, to maintain relative pay differentials (similar to the effects of minimum-wage increases).

Even absent organizing activities in their spheres, nonunion employers may also follow the standards that unions help establish through politicking for labor-friendly policies, instituting informal and formal rules governing labor conditions, and generally serving as a cultural force arguing for a “fairer share” for working men and women. (For example, highly unionized states helped lift minimum wages above the levels of states where labor was comparatively weak.) Higher pay in organized establishments increases competition for labor so that nonunion firms lift wages to prevent their employees from leaving for higher, union wages. And in setting wages, new market entrants often look to what industry leaders are doing; when organized labor was strong, many of these leaders were unionized.

Rebuilding our system of collective bargaining is an important tool available for fueling wage growth for both low- and middle-wage workers and ending the era of persistent wage stagnation.

Excerpted from Economic Policy Institute 8/30/16)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Union decline lowers wages of nonunion workers The overlooked reason why wages are stuck and inequality is growing

Missouri mega donor spent another $2.3 million pushing ‘right to work’

Joplin businessman David Humphreys continues to spend big in the hopes he can fill the Missouri General Assembly with lawmakers who will finally pass a “right to work” law.

Humphreys and his family were busy in the run-up to the August primary supporting challengers to Republican incumbents who have historically opposed tougher regulations on labor unions. That includes pumping nearly $3 million into a political action committee called Committee For Accountable Government.

His efforts proved successful, as two incumbent House Republicans were defeated and his preferred candidates for the Missouri Senate emerged victorious in contested primaries.

Now he’s setting his sights on the November election, and in the past 10 days has doled out $2.3 million to various candidates, including a $1 million check to the Committee For Accountable Government.

His primary goal is a so-called “right to work” law, which would prohibit contracts that require workers to pay dues or fees to a union as a condition of employment. Supporters argue right to work would strengthen the state’s economy and encourage businesses to grow. Opponents say it would weaken labor unions, lower wages and compromise workplace safety.

Republicans have the votes to pass right to work, but not enough to override a governor’s veto. That’s why labor unions have poured their resources into the gubernatorial campaign of Democrat Chris Koster, who has pledged to oppose right to work.

In the same time period that Humphreys spent $2.2 million, various unions have given Koster a little more than $1 million.

(Excerpted from Handcock Kansas City Star 8/30/16)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Missouri mega donor spent another $2.3 million pushing ‘right to work’

Black activists in missouri are fighting to preserve the right to vote

On November 8, Missourians will head to the polls to elect the president and a host of statewide officials in a deeply divided state. But this time, they will also be asked — in language that some have described as confusing — whether they want to amend their constitution to open the door to stricter voting laws. If passed, Amendment Six would give a second chance to HB 1631, which was vetoed earlier this summer by Gov. Jay Nixon after passing both state House and Senate. The proposed law aims to limit the forms of ID accepted at the polls to valid Missouri or federal IDs with photos and expiration dates — excluding currently accepted documents like college IDs, driver’s licenses from other states, expired IDs, voter registration cards, and utility bills. Voters without the required ID could sign a sworn statement affirming their identity and recognizing that such ID is “the law of the land” or they could cast a provisional ballot, not valid until they prove their identity.

There are an estimated 220,000 registered voters in Missouri without a state ID, according to Secretary of State Jason Kander, and they are disproportionately African-American, elderly, disabled, and poor.

(Excerpted from The Intercept 8/30/16)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Black activists in missouri are fighting to preserve the right to vote

Very sad news: Liz Schmidt passed away this Friday (9/02/16) morning.


Her son, Fred pointed out,”Yesterday was (her) 87th birthday, and she was hoping to make it to Election Day. If she could have said, her last words would have been ‘get out and vote!'”

Arrangements will be announced when details become available

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Very sad news: Liz Schmidt passed away this Friday (9/02/16) morning.

The myth of ‘midnight regulations’

As the Obama administration comes to a close, talk of “midnight regulations” has all too predictably picked up in conservative policymaking circles.

The term technically refers to regulations issued in the final months of a presidential term that are subject to reversal by the next Congress and president under the Congressional Review Act. But the term has taken on a life of its own, with opponents of outgoing administrations branding any final
regulations as “midnight rules” in an attempt to delegitimize them based solely on their timing. For instance, one recent report criticized such regulations as “not thought through as carefully as other regulations.”

While there are a variety of nuanced iterations to these attacks, all of them are premised on the unsubstantiated myth that regulations issued in the final months and weeks of an administration are somehow rushed and inadequately vetted.

Listening to the critics, you’d think the president woke up the morning after Election Day and decided to enact as many new regulations as possible in a final frenzy of rulemaking before leaving office.
But a new report released in July by Public Citizen suggests that nothing could be further from the truth. Examining all economically significant regulations since 1999, the report found that rules issued during the presidential transition period spent even more time in the rulemaking process and received even more extensive vetting than other rules. They weren’t rushed at all—quite the opposite.
Rules issued during the transition period took, on average, 3.6 years to complete—longer than it takes for most people to earn a law degree—compared to 2.8 years for all other rules.

(Excerpted from Politico 8/30/16)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The myth of ‘midnight regulations’

Koster defends labor interests

Chris Koster, the Democrat who hopes to become Missouri’s next governor in the November general election, spoke on behalf of the working man Saturday night in St. Joseph.

Speaking before a large audience of pro-Democratic labor union members, Koster said it’s incumbent on voters to reject right-to-work laws as erroneous for bettering the state’s economy. The occasion for his address was the Northwest Missouri Central Labor Council Barbecue held at Callison Hall.

The gubernatorial candidate focused the virtual entirety of his remarks on labor issues.

“We’re talking about the need to keep right to work out of the state of Missouri and to keep wages of working families in the state right here in St. Joe at a good, sound level, so that they can raise families,” Koster said while summing up his speech.

Koster said Eric Greitens, his Republican opponent for the governor’s seat, represents “the blow-it-up wing of the Republican Party” and favors lowering wages in a belief that the economy will be stimulated.

“We think lowering people’s wages is bad for our state,” he added. “It’s one of the issues that is in play in this gubernatorial election.”

With just over 70 days left in the campaign, he worked to rouse election fervor among the friendly audience. He targeted what termed is a small group of Republicans and their vision of labor’s role, labeling right to work “a foolish mistake.”

“We all know that there is a lot at stake,” said Koster, Missouri’s current attorney general. “At the root of it, they just want to get rid of collective bargaining. I’ve been fighting them since I came to Jefferson City.”

(Excerpted fromSt. Joseph News-Press 8/27/16)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Koster defends labor interests

Download September 2016 Newsletter

Click on the following link to read the newsletter in pdf format: BOCODemsNewsletterSep

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Download September 2016 Newsletter

Missouri Republicans gearing up for another voter ID fight

A decade ago, Missouri Republicans began their quest to require voters to present a government-issued photo ID before casting a ballot.

Every time they’ve gotten close to succeeding, something has come along to put the kibosh on the idea — either a court ruling, a Democratic filibuster or Gov. Jay Nixon’s veto pen.

GOP leaders believe they’ll take the first step toward finally putting the issue to rest when they return to the Capitol next month to consider whether to override Nixon’s latest veto of a voter ID bill.

Then in November, voters will weigh in on an amendment to the state constitution allowing a voter ID law, a necessary second step in the process because the Missouri Supreme Court previously declared voter ID laws unconstitutional.

A decade ago, Missouri Republicans began their quest to require voters to present a government-issued photo ID before casting a ballot.

Every time they’ve gotten close to succeeding, something has come along to put the kibosh on the idea — either a court ruling, a Democratic filibuster or Gov. Jay Nixon’s veto pen.

GOP leaders believe they’ll take the first step toward finally putting the issue to rest when they return to the Capitol next month to consider whether to override Nixon’s latest veto of a voter ID bill.

Then in November, voters will weigh in on an amendment to the state constitution allowing a voter ID law, a necessary second step in the process because the Missouri Supreme Court previously declared voter ID laws unconstitutional.

(Excerpted from Hancock,Kansas City Star 08/26/16)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Missouri Republicans gearing up for another voter ID fight

Trump: Americans could be tried in Guantánamo

A President Donald Trump might push for Americans accused of terrorism to be tried in a military tribunal at the U.S. Navy base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, the Republican nominee told the Miami Herald on Thursday.

“I would say they could be tried there, that would be fine,” Trump said in a brief interview ahead of his speech to home builders in Miami Beach.

Under current federal law, it’s illegal to try U.S. citizens at military commissions. Changing the law would require an act of Congress.

(Excerpted from Miami Hearald 8/11/16)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Trump: Americans could be tried in Guantánamo

State agricultural associations support Koster

The latest group to pitch tent in the Koster camp is the Missouri Soybean Association. Its board of directors voted to endorse Koster for Governor on Thursday, Aug. 11.

“Chris Koster has shown he understands agriculture and what it takes to grow our state’s number one industry,” said Matt McCrate, Missouri Soybean Association president and a soybean farmer from Cape Girardeau County. “He has been a great partner to Missouri soybean growers and has committed to prioritize agriculture as our Governor.”

The Missouri Soybean Association’s endorsement of Koster comes on the heels of another huge endorsement — that of the Missouri Farm Bureau, one of the most influential rural organizations in the state. It had been decades since the Missouri Farm Bureau endorsed a Democrat running for Missouri governor.
The Missouri Corn Growers Association also pledged its support of Koster this week.

“Attorney General Koster’s record of supporting agriculture is unquestionable. We are confident he will continue to work in the best interest of Missouri’s farm families and are proud to support him in the race for Missouri governor,” aid MCGA President Morris Heitman, a corn grower from Mound City, Mo.

(Excerpted from Hannibal Courier Post 8/11/2016)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on State agricultural associations support Koster

The GOP must dump Trump

The Muslim ban, the David Duke denial, the “Mexican” judge flap, the draft dodger denigrating John McCain’s military service, the son of privilege attacking an immigrant Gold Star motherand the constant revisionism and lying about past political positions taken are but a few of the lowlights that have punctuated Donald Trump’s chaotic chase for the presidency.

Any one of these offenses would have disqualified any other candidate for president.

That appears to be changing. Post-convention polls show Trump falling behind by double digits both nationally and in must-win swing states like Pennsylvania, New Hampshire and Virginia.

And the political ride will only get rockier for Trump in the coming days after he suggested that one way to keep a conservative Supreme Court after Hillary Clinton got elected would be to assassinate her or federal judges. Trump and his supporters have been scrambling wildly all day to explain away the inexplicable, but they can stop wasting their time. The GOP nominee was clearly suggesting that some of the “Second Amendment people” among his supporters could kill his Democratic opponent were she to be elected.

We are in uncharted waters but that does not mean that the way forward is not clear. It is.

  1. The Secret Service should interview Donald Trump and ask him to explain his threatening comments.
  2. Paul Ryan and every Republican leader should denounce in the strongest terms their GOP nominee suggesting conservatives could find the Supreme Court more favorable to their desires if his political rival was assassinated.
  3. Paul Ryan and every Republican leader should revoke their endorsement of Donald Trump. At this point, what else could Trump do that would be worse than implying the positive impact of a political assassination?
  4. The Republican Party needs to start examining quickly their options for removing the Republican nominee.

A bloody line has been crossed that cannot be ignored. At long last, Donald Trump has left the Republican Party few options but to act decisively and get this political train wreck off the tracks before something terrible happens.

(Excerpted from Scarborough Washington Post 8/09/16)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The GOP must dump Trump

Nuke fears grow over Trump

Nuclear security experts are nervous about the prospect of a Donald Trump presidency.

Former officials from both Republican and Democratic administrations are expressing concern over what they describe as Trump’s cavalier rhetoric about using nuclear weapons and potentially allowing them to be obtained by U.S. allies.

“This is the most dangerous thing that he has said, among many dangerous and stupid things,” said Mark Fitzpatrick, 26-year veteran of the State Department who worked on nonproliferation issues under former Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.
The narrative is damaging to Trump because it plays right into the hands of Hillary Clinton and her supporters, who say that Trump’s inexperienced hand makes him too dangerous a liability for the White House.
At the Pentagon on Thursday, President Obama responded directly to concerns that Trump was woefully unprepared to man the United States’ nuclear arsenal.

“Just listen to what Mr. Trump has to say and make your own judgment with respect to how confident you feel about his ability to manage things like our nuclear triad,” Obama said, referring to the three-pronged set of air, land and sea defenses that have been the backbone of nuclear weapons policy for a generation. During a Republican primary debate, Trump appeared not to be aware of the concept.

Earlier in the week, Obama called Trump “unfit” to serve as commander-in-chief, and his comments have been underlined by some Republicans.

Former Sen. Gordon Humphrey (R-N.H.) described Trump as a “sociopath” in an email to NBC News, calling him “pathologically insecure.”

“To imagine Trump in charge of our armed forces at a moment of crisis is frightening,” Humphrey added.

he Hill spoke to more than half-a-dozen nuclear weapons experts for this story. All expressed a level of concern or anxiety about Trump’s control of nuclear weapons and his leadership of global nonproliferation.

“This could really trigger nuclear wars that could end mankind. Is that what he wants?” said Fitzpatrick, the executive director of the U.S. office of the International Institute for Strategic Studies, who has been publicly critical of Trump in the past. “Talking about nuclear weapons the way he talked about it is not rational.”

Trump’s position on nuclear weapons were scrutinized again this week, following remarks by MSNBC “Morning Joe” host Joe Scarborough, a former Republican member of Congress, that the GOP nominee had repeatedly asked a foreign policy briefer why the U.S. could not use its vast nuclear arsenal.

“When it comes to nuclear weapons, [lack of] message discipline is a policy weakness,” added James Acton, co-director of the nuclear policy program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, who is unaligned on the presidential race.

Trump has been willing to talk more openly about the possibility of using nuclear weapons in a future conflict than other politicians before him.

Not only might he be willing to use nuclear weapons in a conflict in Europe, he has said, but he might employ them in a fight against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

“Somebody hits us within ISIS, you wouldn’t fight back with a nuke?” he said on MSNBC in March.

The suggestion is a dramatic escalation in the conception of how nuclear weapons are used.

Trump has repeatedly tried to maintain an aura of unpredictability, claiming that there is power in keeping adversaries guessing. But there’s also a risk, his critics claim, if no one knows when the line is crossed.

“Uncertainty in this business is a dangerous thing,” said John Noonan, a former national security advisor to Jeb Bush and Mitt Romney who has opposed Trump’s campaign, on MSNBC this week. Noonan has signed an open letter from dozens of Republican national security officials pledging not to support Trump.

“It’s fundamentally dangerous.”

(Excerpted from The Hill 8/06/16)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Nuke fears grow over Trump

Trump adviser’s public comments, ties to Moscow stir unease in both parties

In early June, a little-known adviser to Donald Trump stunned a gathering of high-powered Washington foreign policy experts meeting with the visiting prime minister of India, going off topic with effusive praise for Russian President Vladimir Putin and Trump.

The adviser, Carter Page, hailed Putin as stronger and more reliable than President Obama, according to three people who were present at the closed-door meeting at Blair House — and then touted the positive effect a Trump presidency would have on U.S.-Russia relations.

A month later, Page dumbfounded foreign policy experts again by giving another speech harshly critical of U.S. policy — this time in Moscow.

The United States and other western nations have “criticized these regions for continuing methods which were prevalent during the Cold War period,” Page said in a lecture at the New Economic School commencement. “Yet ironically, Washington and other Western capitals have impeded potential progress through their often hypocritical focus on ideas such as democratization, inequality, corruption and regime change.”

Page is a little-known Trump adviser with an ambiguous role in his campaign. But since being named to the Republican nominee’s team in March, his stature within the foreign policy world has grown considerably, drawing alarm from more established foreign policy experts who view him as having little real understanding about U.S.-Russia relations. Many also say that Page’s views may be compromised by his investment in Russian energy giant, Gazprom.

(Excerpted from Washington Post 8/05/16)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Trump adviser’s public comments, ties to Moscow stir unease in both parties

Trump’s economic advisory group clashes with populist image

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s team of economic policy advisers is packed with moguls from the hedge fund and investment banking industries that he has railed against in the past.

And none of them are women – a demographic group he needs to court if he hopes to win in November.

Trump’s campaign has been powered by a populist message that criticizes corporate America for outsourcing jobs, profiting at the expense of everyday workers and buying influence in Washington. The message resonates best with middle-class and working-class voters buffeted by the forces of globalization.

But among the members of the 13-member team of advisers announced on Friday are hedge-fund billionaire John Paulson and investment bankers Steve Feinberg and Andy Beal, as well as a former top steel executive and a former high-ranking U.S. government official.

“‎It is a hallowed campaign tradition. Malign an industry, but court its wealthy big shots,” said Erik Gordon, a professor of law and business at the University of Michigan.

The reliance on Wall Street executives comes after Trump spent much of his primary campaign lambasting the industry for paying too little in taxes. “The hedge fund guys are getting away with murder,” Trump said in an interview last year.

(Excerpted from Oliphant, Rueters 8/05/16)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Trump’s economic advisory group clashes with populist image

Unions could make a comeback — if we help them

You won’t hear opponents admit it, but unions are popular and have been for a while. Last year Gallup found that 58 percent of Americans approved of unions. Since Gallup first asked people about their support for unions in 1936, approval dipped below 50 percent just once — when it dropped to 48 percent at the height of the Great Recession in 2009.

….the erosion in union membership is not a natural, pre-ordained outcome — the reality is that intentional policy choices significantly contributed to fewer people becoming union members. Benign market forces alone do not explain the continual loss of union membership in the midst of broad support.

Our country has allowed a broken and outdated labor law to remain in place for too long. Unlike other workplace laws, the National Labor Relations Act lacks meaningful financial penalties for employer wrongdoing, creating an economic incentive for employers to violate the law. Employers routinely influence union elections in their favor through intimidating and coercive tactics. In doing so, employers both regularly break the letter and spirit of the law, often aided by anti-union consultants and lawyers who are paid handsomely to provide advice on how to get away with manipulating the system. The fact is that current law does not offer working people a level playing field, advantaging chief executives set on denying their employees’ right to organize and negotiate together.

Americans are choosing to speak up together at work because they recognize that unions serve as a needed check and balance on corporate power. When working people can negotiate a fair return on their work, they earn higher wages and better benefits. The activism of individuals in unions has a ripple effect across communities. Non-union employees in similar industries and nearby locations generally see their working standards improve. It’s no surprise, then, that the decrease in unions has contributed to the increase in income inequality.

People also know that joining together is the only effective rampart against the flood of money in a post-Citizens United world that promotes the agenda of the wealthy few. Unions have proven to be the singular political force that can speak up for the betterment of everyday people, regularly advocating for expanded access to affordable health care, improved class sizes in our schools, investments in infrastructure, the protection of Social Security and Medicare, safer patient care and a fairer tax code.

nions of working people led the national conversation about raising the minimum wage, making wage stagnation and inequality a national priority. Unions even played a key role in defending the Obama administration’s update to our overtime rules from political attacks. The new rule will significantly increase the number of people who qualify for overtime protections by raising the annual salary threshold from $23,660 to $47,476, improving the lives of supervisors as much, if not more so, than people who are or could potentially be union members.

The reason for the difference between the high numbers of support for unions and the number of actual union members is not so paradoxical. We can narrow the gap between these two statistics by modernizing our labor law, establishing real financial penalties to end employer retaliation and ensuring every person’s workplace rights are protected. Doing so will give Americans a fair shot at coming together to negotiate for a better life for themselves and their families.

(Excerpted from Wasser Washington Post 8/03/16)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Unions could make a comeback — if we help them

I Ran the C.I.A. Now I’m Endorsing Hillary Clinton

During a 33-year career at the Central Intelligence Agency, I served presidents of both parties — three Republicans and three Democrats. I was at President George W. Bush’s side when we were attacked on Sept. 11; as deputy director of the agency, I was with President Obama when we killed Osama bin Laden in 2011.

I am neither a registered Democrat nor a registered Republican. In my 40 years of voting, I have pulled the lever for candidates of both parties. As a government official, I have always been silent about my preference for president.

No longer. On Nov. 8, I will vote for Hillary Clinton. Between now and then, I will do everything I can to ensure that she is elected as our 45th president.

Two strongly held beliefs have brought me to this decision. First, Mrs. Clinton is highly qualified to be commander in chief. I trust she will deliver on the most important duty of a president — keeping our nation safe. Second, Donald J. Trump is not only unqualified for the job, but he may well pose a threat to our national security.

I spent four years working with Mrs. Clinton when she was secretary of state, most often in the White House Situation Room. In these critically important meetings, I found her to be prepared, detail-oriented, thoughtful, inquisitive and willing to change her mind if presented with a compelling argument.

I also saw the secretary’s commitment to our nation’s security; her belief that America is an exceptional nation that must lead in the world for the country to remain secure and prosperous; her understanding that diplomacy can be effective only if the country is perceived as willing and able to use force if necessary; and, most important, her capacity to make the most difficult decision of all — whether to put young American women and men in harm’s way.

In sharp contrast to Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Trump has no experience on national security. Even more important, the character traits he has exhibited during the primary season suggest he would be a poor, even dangerous, commander in chief.

These traits include his obvious need for self-aggrandizement, his overreaction to perceived slights, his tendency to make decisions based on intuition, his refusal to change his views based on new information, his routine carelessness with the facts, his unwillingness to listen to others and his lack of respect for the rule of law.

The dangers that flow from Mr. Trump’s character are not just risks that would emerge if he became president. It is already damaging our national security.

President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia was a career intelligence officer, trained to identify vulnerabilities in an individual and to exploit them. That is exactly what he did early in the primaries. Mr. Putin played upon Mr. Trump’s vulnerabilities by complimenting him. He responded just as Mr. Putin had calculated.

Mr. Putin is a great leader, Mr. Trump says, ignoring that he has killed and jailed journalists and political opponents, has invaded two of his neighbors and is driving his economy to ruin. Mr. Trump has also taken policy positions consistent with Russian, not American, interests — endorsing Russian espionage against the United States, supporting Russia’s annexation of Crimea and giving a green light to a possible Russian invasion of the Baltic States.

My training as an intelligence officer taught me to call it as I see it. This is what I did for the C.I.A. This is what I am doing now. Our nation will be much safer with Hillary Clinton as president.

(Excerpted from Morell New York Times 8/05/16)
[Michael J. Morell was the acting director and deputy director of the Central Intelligence Agency from 2010 to 2013.]

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on I Ran the C.I.A. Now I’m Endorsing Hillary Clinton

The most com­pel­ling Sen­ate chal­lenger in the coun­try

Mis­souri is the seat that Re­pub­lic­ans are most wor­ried about. One top GOP strategist in­volved in Sen­ate races called the Demo­crat­ic nom­in­ee, Sec­ret­ary of State Jason Kander, the most com­pel­ling Sen­ate chal­lenger in the coun­try. “Party aside, if I had to choose any can­did­ate in the coun­try to run, I’d pick Kander,” said the strategist. Blunt is polling un­der 50 per­cent back home (lead­ing 47-43 per­cent in a re­cent Ma­son-Dix­on poll), is a con­sum­mate polit­ic­al in­sider in an out­sider year, and is find­ing his at­tacks on na­tion­al se­cur­ity are ringing hol­low against a Demo­crat who served in the mil­it­ary in Afgh­anistan. In a sign of how Trump scrambles the polit­ic­al dy­nam­ic in key races, Kander is at­tack­ing Blunt for stick­ing with Trump des­pite the GOP nom­in­ee’s acid­ic at­tacks against a Gold Star mil­it­ary fam­ily who ap­peared at the Demo­crat­ic Na­tion­al Con­ven­tion.

(Excerpted from The National Journal 8/02/16)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The most com­pel­ling Sen­ate chal­lenger in the coun­try